🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously went for Zohran now. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it because then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on the island with a high participation. I think there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.