🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.